Effects of Steady State and High-Intensity Exercise on Compensatory Eating Behavior
Main Article Content
Keywords
Caloric Expenditure, Macronutrients, Eating Behaviors
Abstract
Introduction: Studies have shown differences in weight loss between high-intensity interval training (HI) and moderate continuous training (SS) potentially due to compensatory eating behaviors. The aim of this study is to observe the differences in eating behaviors HI and SS exercise.
Methods: Nine lean, college-aged individuals and participated in this study. Subjects completed three trials in a randomized order. During HI, subjects completed 16 intervals alternating between 90% and 50% VO2max (1:1). During SS, subjects ran at 70% VO2max. Subjects sat quietly during the control trial. Food logs were collected 24 hours before and after exercise bouts. Data was analyzed using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. All data are presented as mean ± SE.
Results: Caloric intake was not different between trials (CON: 1558 ± 172 kcal, HI: 1851±150 kcal, SS: 1683±143 kcal, p=0.23). Carbohydrate was not different between trials (CON: 186 ± 25g, HI: 225 ± 24g, SS: 201 ± 23g, p=0.41). Fat was not different between trials (CON: 55 ± 8g, HI: 73 ± 9g, SS: 63 ± 5g, p=0.16). Protein was not different between trials (CON: 78 ± 28g, HI: 69 ± 10g, SS: 70 ± 14g, p=0.64).
Conclusions: Acute HI exercise did not lead to different compensatory eating behaviors compared to SS exercise. Practitioners may feel confident to recommend any exercise model without concern for compensatory overeating.
References
2. Whybrow S, Hughes D, Ritz P, et al. The effect of an incremental increase in exercise on appetite, eating behaviour and energy balance in lean men and women feeding ad libitum. British Journal of Nutrition. 2008;100(5): 1109-1115. doi:10.1017/S0007114508968240
3. King N, Hopkins M, Caudwell P, Stubbs RJ, & Blundell J. Individual variability following 12 weeks of supervised exercise: identification and characterization of compensation for exercise-induced weight loss Int J Obes. 2008;32: 177–184. doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.0803712
4. Fearnbach SN, Masterson TD, Schlechter HA, et al. Perceived Exertion during Exercise Is Associated with Children's Energy Intake. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(4):785-792. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001165
5. Alkahtani SA, Byrne NM, Hills AP, King NA. Interval training intensity affects energy intake compensation in obese men. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab. 2014;24(6):595-604. doi:10.1123/ijsnem.2013-0032
6. Martins C, Stensvold D, Finlayson G, et al. Effect of moderate-and high-intensity acute exercise on appetite in obese individuals. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(1), 40-48. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000372
7. American College of Sports Medicine. ACSM's guidelines for exercise testing and prescription. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013.
8. Deighton K, Barry R, Connon C. et al. Appetite, gut hormone and energy intake responses to low volume sprint interval and traditional endurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013;113, 1147–1156. doi:10.1007/s00421-012-2535-1
9. Deighton K., Karra E., Batterham R, Stensel D. (2013). Appetite, energy intake, and PYY3–36 responses to energy-matched continuous exercise and submaximal high-intensity exercise. Appl Physiol, Nutr, and Metab. 2013;38(9), 947-952. doi:10.1139/apnm-2012-0484
10. Thompson W. Now trending: worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2014. ACSM's Health & Fitness Journal. 2013;17(6), pp.10-20. doi:10.1249/FIT.0b013e3182a955e6
11. Sim A., Wallman K., Fairchild T. et al. High-intensity intermittent exercise attenuates ad-libitum energy intake. Int J Obes. 2014;38, 417–422. doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.102
12. Kawano H, Mineta M, Asaka M., et al. Effects of different modes of exercise on appetite and appetite-regulating hormones. Appetite. 2013;66, 26-33. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.01.017
13. Thum J, Parsons G, Whittle T, Astorino T. High-Intensity Interval Training Elicits Higher Enjoyment than Moderate Intensity Continuous Exercise. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(1): e0166299. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166299
14. Li E, Tsang L, Lui S. Menstrual cycle and voluntary food intake in young Chinese women. Appetite. 1999;33(1), 109-118. doi:10.1006/appe.1999.0235
15. Bowen D, Grunberg N. Variations in food preference and consumption across the menstrual cycle. Phys & Behav. 1990;47(2), 287-291. doi:10.1016/0031-9384(90)90144-S.
16. Reed S, Levin F, Evans S. Changes in mood, cognitive performance and appetite in the late luteal and follicular phases of the menstrual cycle in women with and without PMDD (premenstrual dysphoric disorder). Horm Behav. 2008;54(1):185-193. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.02.018
17. Cross G, Marley J, Miles H, Willson K. Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome. British Journal of Nutrition. 2001;85(4):475-482. doi:10.1079/BJN2000283
18. Koch C, Lowe, C, Pretz D, et al. High‐fat diet induces leptin resistance in leptin‐deficient mice. J Neuroendocrinol. 2014;26(2), 58-67. doi:10.1111/jne.12131
19. Marzullo P, Verti B, Savia G, et al. The relationship between active ghrelin levels and human obesity involves alterations in resting energy expenditure. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(2), 936-939. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-031328
20. Marzullo P, Salvadori A, Brunani A, et al. Acylated ghrelin decreases during acute exercise in the lean and obese state. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;69(6):970-971. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03275.x
21. Shiiya T, Nakazato M, Mizuta M, et al. Plasma ghrelin levels in lean and obese humans and the effect of glucose on ghrelin secretion. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(1), 240-244. doi:10.1210/jcem.87.1.8129