Changes in Body Composition and Activity Levels of a Division-1 Football Team During COVID-19

Main Article Content

Mitchell C. Cholewinski
Julie Anna Buzzard
Quiara Gordon
Ryan N. Ross
LesLee K. Funderburk
Andrew Galucci


Body Composition, Division-1 Football, Self-Reported Activity


Introduction: The effect that training cessation due to the COVID-19 pandemic had on a Division-1 football team’s activity levels and body composition.
Methods: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) were taken in February and upon return to campus during the athletic department’s normal medical screenings. To measure the athletes’ activity during the suspended activity period the validated Modifiable Activity Questionnaire (MAQ) was given to the athletes to confidentially complete. Along with the MAQ were two rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scales that corresponded to cardiovascular work or strength work.
Results: Strength/Weight training was the most frequent activity recorded during this time (n = 56) with an average of 16.14 sessions (SD = 6.92) per-month. Significant fat mass increased and lean mass losses were seen in both linemen/non-linemen. Frequency of training was a significant predictor of lean mass loss in non-linemen but not linemen.
Conclusions: During the COVID-19 suspension of activities the athletes saw significant decreases in fat free mass with increases in fat mass and body fat percentage. Although, strength/weight training was the most frequently reported activity undertaken during this time it was still not sufficient to maintain the fat free mass of the athletes.

Abstract 275 | PDF Downloads 119


1. CDC. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Published February 11, 2020. Accessed October 14, 2020.
2. Tison GH, Avram R, Kuhar P, et al. Worldwide Effect of COVID-19 on Physical Activity: A Descriptive Study. Ann Intern Med. Published online June 29, 2020. doi:10.7326/M20-2665
3. Maugeri G, Castrogiovanni P, Battaglia G, et al. The impact of physical activity on psychological
health during Covid-19 pandemic in Italy. Heliyon. 2020;6(6):e04315.
4. Cellini N, Canale N, Mioni G, Costa S. Changes in sleep pattern, sense of time and digital media
use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. J Sleep Res. 2020;29(4):e13074. doi:10.1111/jsr.13074
5. Keel PK, Gomez MM, Harris L, Kennedy GA, Ribeiro J, Joiner TE. Gaining “The Quarantine 15:” Perceived versus observed weight changes in college students in the wake of COVID-19. Int
J Eat Disord. 2020;n/a(n/a). doi:10.1002/eat.23375
6. Caterisano A, Decker D, Snyder B, et al. CSCCa and NSCA Joint Consensus Guidelines for
Transition Periods: Safe Return to Training Following Inactivity. Strength Cond J. 2019;41(3):1-23.
7. Myer GD, Faigenbaum AD, Cherny CE, Heidt RS, Hewett TE. Did the NFL Lockout Expose the
Achilles Heel of Competitive Sports? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2011;41(10):702-705. doi:10.2519/jospt.2011.0107.
8. Gribble PA, Terada M, Beard MQ, et al. Prediction of Lateral Ankle Sprains in Football Players Based on Clinical Tests and Body Mass Index. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(2):460-467. doi:10.1177/0363546515614585
9. Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE, Mann JB, Ivey PA, Hirsch KR, Mock MG. Longitudinal Body Composition Changes in NCAA Division I College Football Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31(1):1-8. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001486
10. Binkley T, Daughters S, Weidauer L, Vukovich M. Changes in Body Composition in Division I Football Players Over a Competitive Season and Recovery in Off-Season. J Strength Cond Res. 2015;29(9):2503-2512. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000000886
11. Drew MK, Finch CF. The Relationship Between Training Load and Injury, Illness and Soreness: A Systematic and Literature Review. Sports Med. 2016;46(6):861-883. doi:10.1007/s40279-015- 0459-8
12. Gabbett TJ, Jenkins DG. Relationship between training load and injury in professional rugby league players. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(3):204-209. doi:10.1016/j.jsams.2010.12.002
13. Kriska AM, Knowler WC, LaPorte RE, et al. Development of questionnaire to examine relationship of physical activity and diabetes in Pima Indians. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(4):401-411. doi:10.2337/diacare.13.4.401
14. Robertson RJ, Goss FL, Rutkowski J, et al. Concurrent validation of the OMNI perceived exertion scale for resistance exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(2):333-341. doi:10.1249/01.MSS.0000048831.15016.2A
15. Utter AC, Robertson RJ, Green JM, Suminski RR, McAnulty SR, Nieman DC. Validation of the Adult OMNI Scale of perceived exertion for walking/running exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(10):1776-1780. doi:10.1249/01.mss.0000142310.97274.94
16. Terry T.-K. Huang PhD M, Kari Jo Harris PhD M, PhD REL, Niaman Nazir MBBS M, PhD WB, Harsohena Kaur MD M. Assessing Overweight, Obesity, Diet, and Physical Activity in College Students. J Am Coll Health. 2003;52(2):83-86. doi:10.1080/07448480309595728
17. McLester JRJ, Bishop E, Guilliams ME. Comparison of 1 Day and 3 Days Per Week of Equal- Volume Resistance Training in Experienced Subjects. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(3):273-281.
18. Wernbom M, Augustsson J, Thomeé R. The Influence of Frequency, Intensity, Volume and Mode of Strength Training on Whole Muscle Cross-Sectional Area in Humans. Sports Med. 2007;37(3):225-264. doi:10.2165/00007256-200737030-00004
19. Day ML, McGuigan MR, Brice G, Foster C. Monitoring exercise intensity during resistance training using the session RPE scale. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(2):353-358. doi:10.1519/R-13113.1
20. Jacobson BH, Conchola EC, Smith DB, Akehi K, Glass RG. Relationship Between Selected
Strength and Power Assessments to Peak and Average Velocity of the Drive Block in Offensive Line Play. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(8):2202-2205. doi:10.1519/JSC.0000000000000552

Most read articles by the same author(s)